On Apr 29, 8:37 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 4/29/2012 3:22 AM, 1Z wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 11:19 pm, meekerdb<meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >>>> That's why I said, except for people who believe in philosophical
> >>>> zombies.
> >>>> Brent
> >>> A quailess AI isn;t a p-zombie. A p-zombie is physically identical to
> >>> a human. An AI will be
> >>> made out of silicon or something, which could naturalsitically explain
> >>> its lack of qualia.
> >>> That is a different matter. With the possible exception of Craig, we
> >>> all think our toasters are
> >>> zombies.
> >> But if our robots behave as intelligently as humans we (except Craig) will
> >> suppose they
> >> have qualia too.
> >> Brent
> > I don't see e why. We already don't, i n several senses. We don't
> > attribute qualia to gadget that are
> > smarter than us at specific tasks such as playing chess. We also don't
> > expect sci fi AIs such as Mr DataA
> > to havea emotions or qualia...in fact we seem to have the intuition
> > that they are qualiless *because* they
> > are so one sidedly logical. Why would qualia help with intelligence
> > anyway? If our AIs showed aesthetic flair,
> > empathy, artistic creatviity etc, that would be another matter. How
> > could you be a great painter without colour
> > qualia? But that's not exactly intelligence.
> By 'behave intelligently' I intended to convey 'with purpose and reflection'
> and just
Why would reflection (higher order thought), or purpose, require
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at