On May 28, 1:40 pm, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > Did I ever once say that free will means acting for no reason? > > That is a very hard question to answer, you said that people don't do > things for a reason but you also said people don't don't do things for a > reason, so is that one reason or two reasons or a infinite number of > reasons or no reason at all? Who can say? Trying to answer a gibberish > question is futile. > > > I only say that reason is irrelevant > > I agree that reason is of no help whatsoever in understanding your > arguments. > > > I'm not asking what caused you to write, I'm asking why you caused that > > to be written. > > ^^^ > So you want to know why; that is to say you think I'm a middle man and > something cause me to cause
No. Just the opposite. You are the source. You cause it to be written by writing it yourself. You are saying that you are a middle man - a passive figurehead between all of the universes reasons and the meaningless writing which you observe. Craig > that to be written and you want to know what > that something is, and you think that if I can not identify what that > something is then my argument is idiotic. In other words despite what you > say your actions prove that you assume I'm either as mechanical as a cuckoo > clock or a complete idiot. I agree with you, smart people do things for > reasons and dumb people and maniacs do things for no reason. > > John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
