On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:21 AM, David Nyman <da...@davidnyman.com> wrote:
> On 2 July 2012 17:50, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And one nanosecond after the copying when one receives sensory impulses that
> originated in Moscow and the other receives sensory impulses that
> originated in Washington neither would be in precisely the first-person
> position they were in before.
> What does that have to do with anything? Is it credible that after all this
> verbiage you have failed to grasp the difference between the first-person
> position of each copy and a third-person description of both copies
> together? Congratulations, John - you really have succeeded in elevating
> the straw man argument to a level hitherto unsuspected.
I'm pretty sure John understands the argument but he prefers to give
primacy to the objective/third-person viewpoint. The first-person
viewpoint involves an assumption that I am a single person travelling
through time in the forward direction, which when looked at
objectively is an illusion. Some people are offended by illusions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at