On 14 Jul 2012, at 15:37, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 7/14/2012 4:26 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Jul 2012, at 20:26, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.07.2012 19:40 John Clark said the following:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi<use...@rudnyi.ru> wrote:
An interesting question is however, where resulting visual mental
concepts are located.
I find it about as interesting as asking where "big" or the number
eleven is located and shows the same profound misunderstanding of
situation on so many different levels that it's hard to know
The question where in physicalism numbers are located is also
interesting indeed. If you know the answer, I would appreciate it.
As I just said to Stephen, numbers are not located anywhere. They
are not physical entities.
With this claim it follows that numbers cannot have *any*
properties that we associate with physical entities. This is a
Not if the physical appears to be a stable lawful collective
hallucination of a class of universal numbers.
But tell me how with a neutral monism, so neutral as to avoid any
properties at all for the basic entity, you are not making worse that
very problem for your approach.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at