On 9/1/2012 7:15 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Yes, that is for the first person time order, and thus for the physical time too, as
the whole physics emerges from the first person plural indeterminacy. But to define
computation, we need a thrid person time, and for this one, as the UD illustrates, we
need only the natural number canonical order: 0, 1, 2, 3, ...
That's sort of a no-person time;
a time not experienced or accessible to anyone.
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ...
I just access it right now.
I don't think so. You just thought and typed those numbers in the 1p time your were
already experiencing; which is easily shown since you would experience it as well if you
had typed 1,9,8,3,2,5,7,4,...
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at