On 8/30/2012 9:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 Aug 2012, at 17:16, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Thinking implies a progression of time. So perhaps it is equally important to
define time.
In the computationlist theory, the digital discrete sequence 0, s(0), s(s(0)) ... is
enough, notably to named the steps of execution of the UD (UD*), or of the programs
execution we can see in UD*, or equivalently in a tiny subset of arithmetical truth.
Are you saying time-order corresponds to the order of execution of steps in the UD? I
don't see how that can be consistent with your idea that our sequence of conscious
experiences corresponds to a "closest continuation" of a our present state. Our present
state is supposedly visited infinitely many times by the UD.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
