String theory and variable fine-structure measurements across the
universe suggest that the discrete and distinct monads are
ennumerable.

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
> On 10/1/2012 10:17 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephen P. King
>>
>> Good idea, but unfortunately monads are not numbers,
>> numbers will now guide them or replace them.
>> Monads have to be associated with corporeal bodies down here in
>> contingia, where crap happens.
>
>
> Hi Roger,
>
>     I agree, monads are not numbers. Monads use numbers.
>
>>
>>
>> Roger Clough,rclo...@verizon.net  10/1/2012
>> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
>>
>>
>> ----- Receiving the following content -----
>> From: Stephen P. King
>> Receiver: everything-list
>> Time: 2012-09-30, 14:22:03
>> Subject: Re: Numbers and other inhabitants of Platonia are also
>> inhabitants ofmonads
>>
>>
>> On 9/30/2012 8:34 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi Bruno Marchal
>>> >
>>> >I'm still trying to figure out how numbers and ideas fit
>>> >into Leibniz's metaphysics. Little is written about this issue,
>>> >so I have to rely on what Leibniz says otherwise about monads.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Previously I noted that numbers could not be monads because
>>> >monads constantly change. Another argument against numbers
>>> >being monads is that all monads must be attached to corporeal
>>> >bodies. So monads refer to objects in the (already) created world,
>>> >whose identities persist, while ideas and numbers are not
>>> >created objects.
>>> >
>>> >While numbers and ideas cannot be monads, they have to
>>> >be are entities in the mind, feelings, and bodily aspects
>>> >of monads. For Leibniz refers to the "intellect" of human
>>> >monads. And similarly, numbers and ideas must be used
>>> >in the "fictional" construction of matter-- in the bodily
>>> >aspect of material monads, as well as the construction
>>> >of our bodies and brains.
>>
>> Dear Roger,
>>
>>       Bruno's idea is a form of "Pre-Established Hamony", in that the
>> "truth" of the numbers is a pre-established ontological primitive.
>>
>> --
>> Onward!
>
>
>
> --
> Onward!
>
> Stephen
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to