On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, the Big Bang is a program. There are initial conditions and rules
>> that lead deterministically to the unfolding of the entire multiverse
>> and all its rich content. All of science is an effort to work out
>> details of the algorithm.
> Then you have a infinite regress. How did the rules get there? A
> programmatic meta-big bang?
Are you asking who made the universe? A possible answer is that all
possible universes exist and we find ourselves in one of those that
has the kind of physical laws leading to observers.
>> > There is nothing that they 'want' or don't want to do.
>> So you say, but the computers could say the same of you.
> They are welcome to. Hey computer! You suck! Insult me!
> But they don't say anything that is beyond their scripted parameters. Not
> ever. That's because they are machines. Basically an elaborate collection of
> springloaded dominoes. There's nothing there to want anything except to fall
> or spring back up.
If a collection of spring-loaded dominoes becomes so complex that you
can't understand it or predict what it's going to do next, you will
have to be careful what you say to it.
>> Which is why it appears that consciousness is epiphenomenal; if it
>> were not then we would be zombies.
> You don't need zombies when you have puppets. Zombies gives an inanimate
> object way too much credit.
I'm not sure why you prefer "puppet" to "zombie" but if they mean the
same thing, OK.
>> By epiphenomenal I mean a necessary side-effect of the type of
>> intelligent behaviour putatively conscious organisms display.
> It's a contradiction to expect that a universe can be based entirely in
> necessity and then to imagine that there could be some kind of side effect
> which is in some way pseudo-experiential. It is sawing off the branch you
> are sitting on. Your argument is an epiphenomenon - a necessary side
> effect...of what?
When you place three spheres together so that they are touching you
create a triangle. The triangle is a necessary side-effect of putting
the spheres together in that way.
When you create a system that perceives, responds, perceives its own
response, adjusts its response, etc. you have a system that is
conscious. The consciousness is a necessary side-effect of such a
Now, you don't like this idea but what's wrong with it apart from
that? It's a minimal explanation and it's consistent with all the
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at