On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Computation is an overly simplified emergent property of sense. If you could
> have computation without sense, then there would be no consciousness.
> Craig
>
Could you provide a link where you more fully explain what sense is
and how it relates to comp and consciousness? You probably already
have. But I missed it.
Richard
>
> On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:50:17 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote:
>>
>> Is consciousness just an emergent property of overly complex computations
>> ?
>>
>> The short answer is that I am proposing that :
>>
>> 1) Penrose's noncomputability position is equivalent to the position
>> that consciousness emerges at such a level of complexity.
>>
>> 2) In addition, that while Godel's incompleteness theorem may make
>> such calculations incomplete, it does not make them beyond the
>> range of computabilitlity.  Instead, it exposes these halted
>> upward-directed
>> calculations to the possibility of continuing downward-directed platonic
>> reason,
>> the numbers themselves, and plato's geometrical forms. I do not know
>> enough
>> mathematics to be more specific.
>>
>> If you would like a more complete discussion, read below.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> =======================================================
>> A MORE COMPLETE ANSWER:
>> Contemporary thinking on consciousness is that it is an "emergent
>> property"
>> of computational complexity among neurons. This raises some questions:
>>
>> A. Is the emergence of consciouness simply a another name for Penrose's
>> condition of non-computability ?
>>
>> http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/presentations/whatisconsciousness.html
>>
>> "Conventional explanations portray consciousness as an emergent property
>> of classical
>> computer-like activities in the brain's neural networks.
>> The prevailing views among scientists in this camp are that
>>
>> 1) patterns of neural network activities correlate with mental states,
>> 2) synchronous network oscillations in thalamus and cerebral cortex
>> temporally bind information,
>> and
>> 3) consciousness emerges as a novel property of computational complexity
>> among neurons."
>>
>>
>>
>> B. Or is there another way to look at this emergence ?
>>
>> Now my understanding of "emergent properties" is that they appear or
>> emerge through looking at a phenomenon
>> at a lower degree of magnification "from above. " Thus sociology is an
>> emergent property of
>> the behavior of many minds.
>>
>> IMHO "from above" means looking downward from Platonia. From a wiser
>> position.
>>
>> Penrose seems to take take two views of Platonia:
>>
>> http://cognet.mit.edu/posters/TUCSON3/Yasue.html
>>
>> One is his belief that there is a realm of non-computability, presumably
>> that of Platonia as experienced.
>> All art and insight comes from such an experience.
>>
>> On the other hand, if I am not mistaken, Penrose seems to believe that the
>> universe is made up of
>> quantum "spin networks", which presumably can model even the most complex
>> entities.
>> He does not seem to deny that the "non-computational" calculations belong
>> to the realm
>> of spin networks.
>>
>> This casts some doubt on his belief in the possibility of
>> non-computability,
>> and may even allow his spin networks, which are presumably complete,
>> to escape intact from Godel's incompleteness limitation.
>>
>> Instead, I propose the following:
>>
>> 1) Penrose's noncomputability position is equivalent to the position
>> that consciousness emerges at such a level of complexity.
>>
>> 2) In addition, that while Godel's incompleteness theorem may make
>> such calculations incomplete, it does not make them beyond the
>> range of computabilitlity. Instead, it exposes these halted
>> upward-directed
>> calculations to the possibility of continuing downward-directed platonic
>> reason,
>> the numbers themselves, and plato's geometrical forms. I do not know
>> enough
>> mathematics to be more specific.
>> =================================================================
>>
>>
>>
>> Roger Clough, rcl...@verizon.net
>> 10/16/2012
>> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/teYzjZJLGQoJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to