corn starch is not a fluid (newtinian or not). It is a solid and when
dissolved in water (or whatever?) it makes a N.N.fluid ---------My question
about it's 'live, or not' status is:
does it provide METABOLISM and REPAIR ?????
I doubt it.
Do not misunderstand me, please: this is not my word about :"LIFE" it
pertains to the LIVE STATUS (process) which - according to Robert Rosen's
brilliant distinction - shows a relying upon environmental (material??)
support for its substinence (called metabolism) and a mechanism to repair
damages that occur in the process of being alive.
Minds with chemistry impediment look differently at things.
PS: I could not enjoy the video in the URL: I got a warning to close it
down because it slows down my browser (to 0).J
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Friday, October 12, 2012 10:23:57 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> On 12 Oct 2012, at 14:50, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>> > They are certainly cool looking and biomorphic. The question I have
>> > is, at what point do they begin to have experiences...or do you
>> > think that those blobs have experiences already?
>> > Would it give them more of a human experience if an oscillating
>> > smiley-face/frowny-face algorithm were added graphically into the
>> > center of each blob?
>> Here is a "deterministic" simple phenomenon looking amazingly
>> "alive" (non-newtonian fluid):
>> Is it alive? That question does not make sense for me. Yes with some
>> definition, no with other one. Unlike consciousness or intelligence
>> "life" is not a definite concept for me. I use usually the definition
>> "has a reproductive cycle". But this makes cigarettes and stars alive.
>> No problem for me.
> "The good news is, after this operation you'll be every bit as alive as a
> cigarette is".
> There are some cool videos out there of cymatic animation like that. All
> that it really tells me is that there are a limited number of morphological
> themes in the universe, not that those themes are positively linked to any
> particular private phenomenology. They are producing those patterns with a
> particular acoustic signal, but we could model it mathematically and see
> the same pattern on a video screen without any acoustic signal at all. Same
> thing happens when we model the behaviors of a conscious mind. It looks
> similar from a distance, but that's all.
>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~**marchal/ <http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at