On 30.10.2012 17:08 meekerdb said the following:
On 10/30/2012 4:45 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:


In this chapter, Van Fraassen has considered a map as a model for a
 typical model. A map is in the objective world, as well as a
scientific model, but to use the map one has to find out where on
the map he/she is located. I hope that you agree with that.

I don't agree with it because it's obviously false.  I just looked a
map to see how close Sandy came to my brother's home in Virginia.  I
didn't need to locate myself on that map.

In this case you need to locate your brother's home on that map. I do not see too much difference.

I would agree with you that my statement does not cover all possible cases that one could imagine to employ a map, but the act of location should be there anyway. There is a correspondence between a real world and a map but the map by itself does not coordinate the reality to itself. This is done by a human being.

Let me recall Van Fraassen's definition of a representation

p. 21 “Z uses X to depict Y as F”

The map seems to fit this pattern pretty well.

Could you imagine some case, when you use a map as a map and you do not need the act of location?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to