On 11/5/2012 11:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I am using the possibility of a claim to make my argument, not
any actual instance of a claim. There is a difference. In comp there
are claims that such and such know or believe or bet. I am trying to
widen our thinking of how the potentials of acts is important.
I don't understand how you reason.
I try to obey the rules of grammar in communication. If a word
implies an action, such as "run" or "implement" or "interview", then
there should be some action involved in the referent of the word. Or
else it does not imply an action and it an object. Simple logical
consistency in semiotics.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at