On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:25:51 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>
> Craig, 
>
> The monads themselves are sensitive,


How? Why?
 

> being able to map or reflect or 
> perceive the rest of the universe instantly. 


That means that this capacity of reflection and perception is more 
primitive than the monads themselves.
 

> Whether they care or not 
> is beyond the scope of science. 


That's a cop out. The truth is the only scope of science.
 

> Not seeing any difference is your 
> problem. Richard 
>

Ok, but why should I want to fix this problem? Why does it matter which 
shapes are fundamental? It's like arguing whether percussion, wind, or 
stringed instruments are responsible for music.

Craig
 

>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Craig Weinberg 
> <whats...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > I don't really see much of a difference whether we talk about BECs, 
> strings, 
> > charged geometries, vacuum flux, aether, numbers, or any other spatially 
> > structured medium. Who cares? The question is how does that begin to 
> know 
> > about something and to care about it? 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:08:35 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Hi Richard Ruquist 
> >> 
> >> OK, I was thinking about appying Leibniz to it. 
> >> 
> >> [Roger Clough], [rcl...@verizon.net] 
> >> 1/16/2013 
> >> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen 
> >> ----- Receiving the following content ----- 
> >> From: Richard Ruquist 
> >> Receiver: everything-list 
> >> Time: 2013-01-16, 08:59:49 
> >> Subject: Re: Fwd: the curse of materialism 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Roger, Any kind of particle from photons and light up to molecules can 
> >> form a BEC. BEC is a mathematical object and not confined to any one 
> >> substance. Even physical BECs have properties that are effectively 
> >> outside spacetime. 
> >> Richard 
> >> 
> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Roger Clough  wrote: 
> >> > Hi Richard Ruquist 
> >> > 
> >> > That sounds fine, except the BEC is not something specific, it is 
> >> > not a mind or brain, it is matter. I imagine that it condenses in 
> >> > some container held near 0oC. That condensate could be 
> >> > considered to be a monad or substance. And it could of course 
> >> > be conscious in some way, but it has nothing to do with being human. 
> >> > It is not even a brain in a vat. 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > [Roger Clough], [rcl...@verizon.net] 
> >> > 1/16/2013 
> >> > "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen 
> >> > ----- Receiving the following content ----- 
> >> > From: Richard Ruquist 
> >> > Receiver: everything-list 
> >> > Time: 2013-01-16, 07:47:52 
> >> > Subject: Fwd: the curse of materialism 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Roger, 
> >> > I liked your "1p think therefore 1p am" 
> >> > 
> >> > But your statement below, although correct , is much too vague. 
> >> > 
> >> > Quantum mechanics is not understood because it is not complete. 
> >> > Feynman came close to completing it but still missed an essential 
> >> > property. 
> >> > 
> >> > That property is that the quantum mind has instant action. 
> >> > Something you have been preaching for some time. 
> >> > With instant action, the quantum mind can be understood. 
> >> > 
> >> > Instant action derives directly from your claim that 
> >> > the quantum mind from monads to quantum fields 
> >> > are out side of spacetime. 
> >> > 
> >> > I just add that it is effectively out of spacetime 
> >> > because the quantum mind is a 
> >> > Bose-Einstein Condensate BEC. 
> >> > which allows the monads to be distributed thru-out the universe yet 
> >> > act as though they were out of spacetime. 
> >> > Richard 
> >> > 
> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- 
> >> > From: Roger Clough 
> >> > Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:01 AM 
> >> > Subject: the curse of materialism 
> >> > To: everything-list 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Hi socr...@bezeqint.net 
> >> > 
> >> > You want to know why nobody understands QM ? 
> >> > Because QM is nonphysical, but is treated as being physical. 
> >> > This might be called the curse of materialism. 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > [Roger Clough], [rcl...@verizon.net] 
> >> > 1/16/2013 
> >> > "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen 
> >> > ----- Receiving the following content ----- 
> >> > From: socr...@bezeqint.net 
> >> > Receiver: Everything List 
> >> > Time: 2013-01-15, 11:20:20 
> >> > Subject: Re: Science is a religion by itself. 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Physics and Metaphysics. 
> >> > 
> >> > John Polkinghorne and his book ? Quantum theory?. 
> >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Polkinghorne 
> >> > === . 
> >> > 
> >> > John Polkinghorne took epigraph for his book ? Quantum theory? 
> >> > the Feynman? thought : ? I think I can safely say that 
> >> > nobody understands quantum mechanics. ? 
> >> > Why? 
> >> > Because, he wrote: 
> >> > ? ,we do not understand the theory as fully as we should. 
> >> > We shall see in what follows that important interpretative 
> >> > issues remain unresolved. They will demand for their 
> >> > eventual settlement not only physical insight but also 
> >> > metaphysical decision ?. 
> >> > / preface/ 
> >> > ? Serious interpretative problems remain unresolved, 
> >> > and these are the subject of continuing dispute? 
> >> > / page 40/ 
> >> > ? If the study of quantum physics teaches one anything, 
> >> > it is that the world is full of surprises? 
> >> > / page 87 / 
> >> > ? Metaphysical criteria that the scientific community take 
> >> > very seriously in assessing the weight to put on a theory 
> >> > include: . . . .? 
> >> > / page 88 / 
> >> > ?uantum theory is certainly strange and surprising, . . .? 
> >> > / page92 / 
> >> > ? Wave / particle duality is a highly surprising and 
> >> > instructive phenomenon, . .? 
> >> > / page 92 / 
> >> > ==. 
> >> > In my opinion John Polkinghorne was right writing 
> >> > what to understand and to solve the problems of the Universe: 
> >> > ? They will demand for their eventual settlement not only 
> >> > physical insight but also metaphysical decision ?. 
> >> > / preface / 
> >> > And, maybe, Aristotle was right separating the world and knowledge 
> >> > on two parts: Physics and Metaphysics. 
> >> > === . 
> >> > Somebody wrote: 
> >> > The science will purify the religion of the ?ross?. 
> >> > I agree. 
> >> > ===========. 
> >> > Best wishes. 
> >> > Israel Sadovnik Socratus. 
> >> > ===. 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups "Everything List" group. 
> >> > To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> > everything-li...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > For more options, visit this group at 
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups "Everything List" group. 
> >> > To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> > everything-li...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > For more options, visit this group at 
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups "Everything List" group. 
> >> > To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> > everything-li...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > For more options, visit this group at 
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups "Everything List" group. 
> >> > To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> > everything-li...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > For more options, visit this group at 
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. 
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> >> "Everything List" group. 
> >> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> everything-li...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> For more options, visit this group at 
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "Everything List" group. 
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/mnLD8PFZdYEJ. 
> > 
> > To post to this group, send email to 
> > everyth...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>. 
>
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/SLNXWQWT-t4J.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to