This note is addressed to all materialists, especially Prof. Dennett. Getting 
from "me" to "I"' 

Self-reference could be a subject/predicate relation. But that doesn't say 
enough because
there are two possible perspectives:

1) "He is a man." Here you are referencing yourself in the 3rd person or 
objective persepective. Bruno Marchall calls this "3p" .

2) "I am a man." This is 1st person. Marshall calls this "1p." 1p is the 
subjective form of self-reference.

Do you see the difference ? Materialism and computer language only gives us the 
objective (descriptive) or 3p format
because it does not contain a subjective element.

Leibniz gets around this problem by including a subjective element, which is
that which perceives the world through the top monad. This subjectrive
element is universal and isa what Plato called the One or Oversoul.

To include such a subjective element, you need to have a point in the
brain which is something like a king, that does all of the perceiving and
governing. He is not a simple homunculus, he makes sense of what the
visual signals in the optical nerves provides us with.

Am I making any sense to you materialists? Can you see the difference between
the "I" perspectiove (what i say above) and the  "me" of conventional 
materialistic theory ?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
For more options, visit

Reply via email to