On 7/12/2013 3:20 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Jul 2013, at 21:31, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/12/2013 11:13 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Because if you agree with "I dunno which city I will see", by deducing it through an
explicit appeal to a level of mechanical substitution, you see that the digital third
person determinacy is responsible for indeterminate, from the first person points of
However this depends on there being no fact-of-the-matter as to which man, Washington
or Moscow, is "you". That either one is "you" seems to depend on memories shared with
you. Any other interpretation would simply say you were annihilated and neither man is
you. This in turn depends on memories being classical things - not subject to quantum
Comp is neutral on the quantum, at the start, then we have to recover it or at least
that is correct.
and not being reversible.
Irreversibility of first person experience can be recovered from reversible
That would be statistical irreversibility, i.e. reversal is improbable but not
Indeed some universal machine are reversible (billiard ball, quantum computer,
But isn't there a distinction between reversible and irreversible computations? Doesn't
the UD do both of them?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.