On 26 October 2013 06:23, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The argument against comp is not one of impossibility, but of empirical > failure. Sure, numbers could do this or that, but our experience does not > support that it has ever happened. In the mean time, the view that I > suggest I think does make more sense and supports our experience fully. > Could you explain this, about how Comp has failed empirically? Comp presupposes that the brain is Turing emulable etc, so if you disagree with that then obviously it fails but not empirically since no one has proved/disproved the brain being TE. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.