On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:29:21 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
> On 30 October 2013 14:26, Craig Weinberg <whats...@gmail.com <javascript:>
> > wrote:
>> On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:40:52 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
>>> On 30 October 2013 13:24, Craig Weinberg <whats...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:52:12 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
>>>>> On 30 October 2013 07:15, Craig Weinberg <whats...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Matter is concrete sense that extends to the inertial frame of the 
>>>>>> body. Get rid of your body, and your dream is matter.
>>>>>> Goo goo goo joob! 
>>>>> Sorry, but that does sound like a surreal 60s lyric, though it could 
>>>>> maybe do with a bit of "poeticisation" to really work.
>>>> Laugh if you must, but if you were in a dreaming coma and never wake 
>>>> up, your matter would be as real to you as anything every could be to 
>>>> anyone. If you can define matter in terms other than what has been 
>>>> detected 
>>>> by our minds using our body's sense, and/or an instrument's sense, then 
>>>> you 
>>>> might have cause to doubt me, but nobody has any other definition 
>>>> available 
>>>> to them.
>>>> Well I did apologise. Anyway I agree with your reply - if you'd said 
>>> that in the first place, it wouldn't have sounded like gobbledegook.
>> It's no problem, I don't mind if people think it sounds ridiculous (I can 
>> often see it that way too if I read it again a couple days) I just have had 
>> so many thousands of hours of conversation with people which are like 70% 
>> complaints about how I write or what right I have to say anything, 25% 
>> being told warmed over versions of freshman year science class, and maybe 
>> 5% actually talking about whether this model I'm talking about might 
>> actually work.
>> I'd be happy to join the 5% if I could understand it. Since I've managed 
> to understand comp up to the MGA that should be a possibility.

Sure, it seems like you are picking up on it so far. I'm always available 
for questions. The main thing is to go to the very root assumptions of 
Western cosmology and flip them. Instead of a universe from nothing, I 
start from everything and then move inward through masking. Sense is 
subtractive, like the spectrum is from white light.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to