On 14 November 2013 10:19, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear LIZ: > More than ~2 million peer-reviewed articles approved the Bible stories > beween 1599 and 2010. We call that 'religon'. (Numbers!!!) Does that make > them true? >
They weren't using the scientific method. Do you think science works, or don't you? > Fossil fuel will not neccesarily run out: nobody will use them after our > demise. > Obviously I meant if we carry on using them. > And for nukes? I would say: O N L Y fusion! > The 'old fashion' fission nuke may be even more danerous than fossil > pollution. > It's a lot more containable, especially subcritical reactors. At least the waste can be stuck inside glass and buried rather pumped into the air. I have been saying fusion myself (as I imagine you already know) by recommending solar power (on the "demon haunted world" thread I think). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
