On 28 December 2013 11:55, Stephen Paul King <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi LizR, > > That is what is not explicitly explained! I could see how one might > make an argument based on Godel numbers and a choice of a numbering scheme > could show the existence of a string of numbers that, if run on some > computer, would generate a description of the interaction of several > actors. But this ignores the problems of concurrency and "point of view". > The best one might be able to do, AFAIK, is cook up a description of the > interactions of many "observers" -each one is an intersection of infinitely > many computations, but such a description would itself be the content of > some observer's point of view that assumes a choice of Godel numbering > scheme. > Something doesn't seem right about this! > > It seems to suggest "multi-solipsism" or something along those lines - which doesn't make it wrong, of course. I await Bruno's answer with interest. I think he has already said something about this, but I don't recall it being satisfactory, at least to my limited understanding. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
