On 28 December 2013 11:55, Stephen Paul King <stephe...@provensecure.com>wrote:

> Hi LizR,
>    That is what is not explicitly explained! I could see how one might
> make an argument based on Godel numbers and a choice of a numbering scheme
> could show the existence of a string of numbers that, if run on some
> computer, would generate a description of the interaction of several
> actors. But this ignores the problems of concurrency and "point of view".
> The best one might be able to do, AFAIK, is cook up a description of the
> interactions of many "observers" -each one is an intersection of infinitely
> many computations, but such a description would itself be the content of
> some observer's point of view that assumes a choice of Godel numbering
> scheme.
>   Something doesn't seem right about this!
> It seems to suggest "multi-solipsism" or something along those lines -
which doesn't make it wrong, of course.

I await Bruno's answer with interest. I think he has already said something
about this, but I don't recall it being satisfactory, at least to my
limited understanding.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to