On 28 December 2013 17:19, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > Stephen, > > Even worse, and less applicable to reality if it's really true, but Jason > is clearly talking about sequences of computations, and befores and afters. > How can sequences occur if there's no time? And how does time arise? >
This is why you have to fully understand the theory before attempting to refute it. > > Seems awfully unrealistic to me.... > > The "argument from incredulity" has not carried much weight for a long time in science. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
