Liz,

Then how about answering my simple questions if you understand UD so well?

Edgar

On Friday, December 27, 2013 11:23:45 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
>
> On 28 December 2013 17:19, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> Stephen,
>>
>> Even worse, and less applicable to reality if it's really true, but Jason 
>> is clearly talking about sequences of computations, and befores and afters. 
>> How can sequences occur if there's no time? And how does time arise?
>>
>
> This is why you have to fully understand the theory before attempting to 
> refute it. 
>
>>
>> Seems awfully unrealistic to me....
>>
>> The "argument from incredulity" has not carried much weight for a long 
> time in science.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to