On 27 Dec 2013, at 23:51, LizR wrote:
The Tao that can be named...
... is NOT the Tao.
Indeed. this is common with most notion of (unique) God, despite most
institutionalized religion fall in the trap.
The comp "religion" has this more in common with taoism. On the divine
truth, the wise remains silent.
To get the nature of buddha, we have to kill all buddhas, some
buddhists said. I take this as a perception that in science, including
theological science, we have to be 100% skeptical on any authoritative
arguments, even those brought naturally by nature.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
