On 29 Dec 2013, at 21:47, meekerdb wrote:

On 12/29/2013 9:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

On 29 Dec 2013, at 14:52, Edgar L. Owen wrote:

Bruno,

Glad we agree that decoherence falsifies collapse. That's a good start!

But decoherence also falsifies MW.

Non collapse = many-worlds, to me. If I make a quantum choice, by QM, I will put myself in a superposition and execute the two alternative of the experience. If one of the two terms disappears, there is collapse.



First of all you have to understand what a wavefunction is. It's not a physical object.

QM is the assumption that particles and fields follows some wave equation.

Or matrix equation or path integral equations.

Right. QM has many different equivalent formulations.

Bruno




Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to