On 30 December 2013 21:02, Stephen Paul King <[email protected]>wrote:
> Dear Bruno, > > Why do you not consider an isomorphism between the Category of > computer/universal-numbers > and physical realities? That way we can avoid a lot of problems! > I think that it is because of your insistence of the Platonic view that > the material/physical realm is somehow lesser in ontological status and the > assumption that a timeless totality = the appearance of change (and its > measures) is illusory. I would like to be wrong in this presumption! > > The problem is that assuming the material / physical realm as fundamental gets you no further than assuming that "God did it!" It's a "shut up and calculate" (or shut up and pray) ontology. With materialism you just have a "brute fact" - well, maybe that's it, maybe there *is *just a brute, unexplained fact. But us ape descended life forms like to look for explanations even beneath the apparent brute facts! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
