On 30 Dec 2013, at 22:00, John Clark wrote:

## Advertising

On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com>wrote:>> That means you think things are realistic, and that means I knowfor a fact your thinking is wrong, not crazy but wrong. We know fromexperiment that Bell's inequality is violated, and that means thatlocality or realism or both MUST be wrong.> Or measurements are multi-valued. MWI has both locality andrealism.If the many World's Theory was local AND realistic we'd know withcertainty that it's wrong because any theory that is consistent withexperimental results can NOT be both.

Only with adding "uniqueness" of the outcomes.

But MWI could be true because although it is realistic it is notlocal.

`I have never seen a proof of this. All proofs assume uniqueness of`

`outcome. I agree that some proof that MW is local admits loophole, but`

`that does not mean that such action at a distance exist, and proof`

`that they exist admits loophole too.`

A entire parallel universe as big as our own that you can never goto or even see is about as far from being local as you can get.

`Differentiation/splitting of "universes" is a local phenomenon. It is`

`not instantaneous at all.`

Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.