On 11 January 2014 17:33, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 1/10/2014 7:33 PM, LizR wrote:
> On 11 January 2014 16:02, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> On 1/10/2014 4:06 PM, LizR wrote:
>> On 11 January 2014 12:54, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/10/2014 1:42 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> Second, a reality can exist without being computed. the best and simple
>>> example is arithmetic. Only a very tiny part of it is computable (this is
>>> provable if you accept the Church Turing thesis).
>>> But it's questionable whether it "exists".
>> Does it kick back? Could two beings in different universes, with
>> different laws of physics (if such exist) discover it independently?
>> Of course "discover" begs the question.
> No it doesn't. It *is* the question. I used "discover" in the sense of
> making a discovery, as opposed to inventing something.
> That's what "begs the question" means, the form of your question
> implicitly assumes the answer you presuppose. "Discover" implies existence
> independent of invention. But that's the point I'm questioning. When we
> count are we discovering 1,2,3,... or are we inventing the concept of
> several things consitituting a numberable set.
THAT'S THE SAME QUESTION I WAS ASKING!
Are you being deliberately aggravating? I ASKED if we discover maths, and
you've come out with all this nonsense saying I'm "begging the question".
But begging the question means assuming the answer to a question, which
isn't what I did. I asked a question.
You may have said something sensible below, but while you appear to be
trolling over this I'm not in a mood to read it,
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.