On 17 January 2014 12:07, LizR <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 January 2014 14:00, Stathis Papaioannou <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> At least *weak* AI would be possible. Weak AI means computers could do
>> everything we do but without necessarily being conscious. Strong AI
>> means they would also be conscious.
>>
> I checked the definition a short whle ago on Wikipedia .... which
> equivocates, imho, saying consciousness is "Associated with" strong AI, and
> that Weak AI is basically "making computers do clever things" (with no
> pretension to being like humans).
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_AI

Historically, AI researchers did not consider the question of whether
a computer that behaves intelligently was conscious, on the assumption
that intelligence was observable while consciousness was not and
therefore not a fit subject for scientists. This makes it a bit
confusing when terms such as strong AI/ weak AI are appropriated by
philosophers such as Searle.


-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to