On 17 January 2014 14:17, Stathis Papaioannou <[email protected]> wrote:
> Historically, AI researchers did not consider the question of whether > a computer that behaves intelligently was conscious, on the assumption > that intelligence was observable while consciousness was not and > therefore not a fit subject for scientists. Hence the Turing test. > This makes it a bit > confusing when terms such as strong AI/ weak AI are appropriated by > philosophers such as Searle. > Yes, I was finding it a bit confusing, especially since the first thing I got on to was Searle's "Strong AI hypothesis" ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
