On 17 January 2014 14:17, Stathis Papaioannou <stath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Historically, AI researchers did not consider the question of whether > a computer that behaves intelligently was conscious, on the assumption > that intelligence was observable while consciousness was not and > therefore not a fit subject for scientists. Hence the Turing test. > This makes it a bit > confusing when terms such as strong AI/ weak AI are appropriated by > philosophers such as Searle. > Yes, I was finding it a bit confusing, especially since the first thing I got on to was Searle's "Strong AI hypothesis" ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.