On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 06:31:16PM -0800, meekerdb wrote: > > So what do you make of Nash's theorem which says every finite game > has an equilibrium in a *mixed* strategy? > > Brent >
What's the relevance? The corollory, I suppose, is that not every game with rational players (ie pure strategy players) has a Nash equilibrium. So what? Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
