On 17 February 2014 00:07, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > Sure, but in taking this view, which is legitimate in its own terms, > you're in danger of turning step 3 into gibberish just to make a point. But > the point you make here is precisely not the point of step 3. That point is > that *anyone whomsoever*, when considering his or her own future, will > reasonably expect to experience it as a single-valued outcome. > > But only insofar as he reasonably expects himself not to be duplicated. >
Well then, facing duplication, would your expectation change to that of personally experiencing a simultaneous two-valued outcome? And if the answer is yes, does that imply that you would reject MWI as a possibility because (I presume) you have never in fact experienced such an outcome? David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
