On 17 February 2014 00:07, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, but in taking this view, which is legitimate in its own terms, > you're in danger of turning step 3 into gibberish just to make a point. But > the point you make here is precisely not the point of step 3. That point is > that *anyone whomsoever*, when considering his or her own future, will > reasonably expect to experience it as a single-valued outcome. > > But only insofar as he reasonably expects himself not to be duplicated. >
Well then, facing duplication, would your expectation change to that of personally experiencing a simultaneous two-valued outcome? And if the answer is yes, does that imply that you would reject MWI as a possibility because (I presume) you have never in fact experienced such an outcome? David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
