Brent,

I agree that we can use our OBSERVATIONS of the dimensional relationships 
of particulate events to construct a meaningful THEORY of space. Newton did 
it. But Einstein found that it really didn't quite work out and came up 
with a new theory. But now we know that doesn't quite work out either and 
we need a new theory that unifies QT and GR and resolves quantum paradox.

So now I suggest a new THEORY to address these problems. So NO, I am NOT 
confusing observation and theory. I'm going back to the actual ontological 
nature of the actual observations and working from there towards a new 
theory of dimensional space.

And I claim that though the OBSERVATIONS are empirical and repeatable, that 
the THEORY of space is a logico-mathematical construct or edifice, rather 
than anything physical.

Edgar

On Friday, March 7, 2014 8:37:48 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
> On 3/7/2014 4:23 PM, Russell Standish wrote: 
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 04:02:46PM -0800, Edgar L. Owen wrote: 
> >> Brent, 
> >> 
> >> Yes, exactly. The agreement of nearly all minds on the values of 
> empirical 
> >> observations is truly remarkable. The vast edifice of science whose 
> >> accuracy is confirmed by the incredibly complex technologies based upon 
> it 
> >> would not exist if this were not so. So there is quite obviously some 
> >> actual universe 'out there' on which minds in general agree no matter 
> how 
> >> minds work... 
> > How does this follow? Couldn't it be possible that our observations 
> > agree (more or less) with each other because we (as observers) are 
> > more less similar to each other? 
>
> And looking at different things?  If we're similar to each other, then 
> similarity of 
> observation implies similarity of the observed. But I think Edgar is 
> confounding 
> "observations" with "theories", or he's not allowing for the different 
> degrees in which 
> theories contribute to observations.  We're very different from Nagel's 
> bat, so we don't 
> perceive the elasticity to objects with our vision as a bat does with 
> sonar.  But we both 
> form a three dimensional model of space. 
>
> Brent 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to