2014-03-20 14:34 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>:

>  Please remember, solar, to remediate, must replace all nat gas, all
> coal, all uranium, all petro that all cities and cars.
>

No it doesn't have to... it's not because it can't currently replace
everything that it can't replace part of it... and it does thanks you're
not the one who decide things.

Quentin


> There are wonderful looking projects that have been proposed for 50 years,
> that for technical reasons, cannot achieve much, other than getting cheers
> from admirers in the media. I love it too, but it must do the rugged,
> robust, work, of replacement of the dirty-to be any good at all. It cannot
> simply be artist work on paper and splashed to the tech heads. My point:
> propaganda doesn't feed empty stomachs.
>
> If that solar farm described in SciAm had been realised it would have been
> carried out by a democratically elected government, not a dictatorship
>
>   -----Original Message-----
> From: LizR <[email protected]>
> To: everything-list <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wed, Mar 19, 2014 6:10 pm
> Subject: Re: The situation at Fukushima appears to be deteriorating
>
>   On 20 March 2014 07:10, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Here's an article that informs me, if nobody else, how complicated the
>> climate thing is.
>>
>> http://phys.org/news/2014-03-goldilocks-principle-hypothesis-earth-habitability.html
>>
>> Beyond that I agree with John on his estimate of cutting the standard of
>> living down, to fit the ideal "environmental foot print."  Improving the
>> standard of living with better energy technology will sustain the billions
>> and flourish the ecosystem-if done right. Technology is the answer, sans,
>> government rule of the public. Dictatorships, even well-meaning ones, are
>> horrible. Use Mao's approach to agricultural production during the Great
>> Leap Forward from 1958-62, as a prime example.
>>
>>   If that solar farm described in SciAm had been realised it would have
> been carried out by a democratically elected government, not a
> dictatorship. Part of the point of having a government is to provide things
> that no individual or profit-based organisation would wish to do, such as
> building motorways, communications networks, hospitals, schools, power
> plants, rail networks, and other infrastructure. This would apply to some
> clean power schemes that are too large for a private investor, which
> applies to (some) tidal, wind, hydro, solar, nuclear etc. I can't imagine
> many private companies would have been building nuclear power plants off
> their own bat in the 1950s.
>
> So we need government to do stuff above the level that private enterprise
> can manage. Dictatorship is simply government done wrong.
>
>   --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to