On 6/9/2014 2:46 PM, LizR wrote:
I guess I could venture that it's the ontology of any TOE in which
interactions are
all 3p.
OK, thanks. So I would guess that it's equivalent to eliminativism, as I think it's
called - the idea that consciousness is an illusion ("albeit a persistent one"). It does
seem that way to me.
I don't think it implies eliminativism. There's still temperature even though we have
statistical mechanics. I think there's far too much importance given to "what's
fundamental" and it leads to calling everything else and illusion. I doubt that Bruno
thinks arithmetic is an illusion just because what's fundamental is 0, S, +, and *. A
correction to this kind of obsession with essence is why I like my virtuous circle of
explanation.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
