On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:55 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: >> Other that the fact than your use of personal pronouns was inexcusably >> sloppy and inconsistent for a good logician, I have long since forgotten >> the details of your "proof". But are you telling me that the grand >> conclusion of step 3 reached after pages of verbiage was "I don't know"? >> The first 2 steps must have been even more trivial, no wonder I stopped >> reading. >> >> > You should read it, THEN criticise. (Although this seems to be a common > mistake.) >
I read the first 3 steps, Bruno made blunders in step 3; a proof is built on the foundations of previous steps therefor it would be idiotic to keep reading a proof, any proof, after a mistake has been found. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
