On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:41 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote : > > >> I read the first 3 steps, Bruno made blunders in step 3; a proof is >> built on the foundations of previous steps therefor it would be idiotic to >> keep reading a proof, any proof, after a mistake has been found. >> > > > That's fair enough. Obviously I missed the blunder in step 3 when I read > it - what is it? >
If after saying whats wrong with Bruno's vacuous "proof" over and over and over and over and over and over again for 3 years and you still ask "what is it" then what would be the point of me repeating it yet again? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
