On 18 June 2014 04:23, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:55 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Other that the fact than your use of personal pronouns was >>> inexcusably sloppy and inconsistent for a good logician, I have long since >>> forgotten the details of your "proof". But are you telling me that the >>> grand conclusion of step 3 reached after pages of verbiage was "I don't >>> know"? The first 2 steps must have been even more trivial, no wonder I >>> stopped reading. >>> >>> > You should read it, THEN criticise. (Although this seems to be a >> common mistake.) >> > > I read the first 3 steps, Bruno made blunders in step 3; a proof is built > on the foundations of previous steps therefor it would be idiotic to keep > reading a proof, any proof, after a mistake has been found. >
That's fair enough. Obviously I missed the blunder in step 3 when I read it - what is it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
