(Or all the above, given a multiverse...) On 15 December 2014 at 07:57, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Singularity" isn't quite the right word, because whatever happens will be > limited by the laws of physics. Maybe nanotech actually is impossible. > Maybe small scale fusion ditto. The assumption that we can increase > everything without limit isn't likely to be correct. We have an idea of > indefinite progress that can't work. The question is how high the peak is > that we can reach. A sustainably run planet? A Dyson sphere? Neither > appears remotely in reach yet, but of course no one knows what's around the > corner. We could be speeding towards utopia, a brick wall, or "1984" - or > 1084, for that matter. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
