On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> The question is not if God exists or not. But if > God = the physical universe? > God = a mathematical structure? Which one? > God = a dream by a universal machine? > God = a sum on all dreams by all universal machines? > God = the one who lost itself in a labyrinth of dreams? > God = the one who plays hide and seek with Itself? > God = the universal person? > God = the universal person completions? (if that exists) > God = Allah? > God = Jesus? > God = Krishna? > God = my tax collector? > God = the one who made the cat in its own image, and then made the humans > to gives the vat the modern comfort, with TV nad bag of catnip? > etc. > If you're correct about that, and I think you are, and it could mean a tax collector or the mathematical universe or anything in between then the word "God" has exactly ZERO information content and writing about "God" accomplishes nothing except cause excessive wear and tear on the O D and G keys on your computer. And yet some people still insist on using the word. Go figure. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
