2015-01-19 16:06 GMT+01:00 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>:

>
> On 19 Jan 2015, at 01:11, meekerdb wrote:
>
>  On 1/18/2015 10:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>  On 16 Jan 2015, at 10:32, LizR wrote:
>
>  Clearly one cannot disbelieve in God without knowing, or at least having
> an idea of, what God is. Personally I don't disbelieve in God, I merely
> find the idea highly unlikely and don't find that it contributes anything
> to discussions such as "why is there something rather than nothing?" So I
> am agnostic, as I am about all the other gods, not to mention Santa, who I
> recently saw on "Doctor Who".
>
>  (Of course I do believe in Daleks
> <https://mayaofauckland.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/rub-vigorously-with-nuns-preparation/>
> ...)
>
>
>  If you believe in Daleks, you believe enough to believe in the God of
> the machine. We need it, to use the theory of machine's dream as an
> explanation why we see physical universes and sometimes pink elephants,
> despite nothing like that really exists.
>
>  I give the math to see if we get right the number of pink elephants in
> the many-dreams (by number) interpretation of elementary arithmetic (0 I
> guess, and hope).
>
>  Keep in mind that God is defined by being the object of the theory of
> everything, or, by definition, the answer we look for with the question
> "why is there something instead of nothing?".
>
>  The question is not if God exists or not. But if
>
>
> But that's silly.  You presume God exists, but with no description, so the
> only task is to find a description to go with the word "God".  If you're
> going to ask whether something exists that cannot be defined ostensively,
> then you need to define it by description.  Otherwise it's just wordplay.
> Compare:
>
> The question isn't whether Paul Bunyan exists or not.  But if
>
> Paul Bunyan = the physical universe?
> Paul Bunyan = a mathematical structure? Which one?
> Paul Bunyan = a dream by a universal machine?
> Paul Bunyan = a sum on all dreams by all universal machines?
> Paul Bunyan = the one who lost itself in a labyrinth of dreams?
> Paul Bunyan = the one who plays hide and seek with Itself?
> Paul Bunyan = the universal person?
> Paul Bunyan = the universal person completions? (if that exists)
> Paul Bunyan = Allah?
> Paul Bunyan = Jesus?
> Paul Bunyan = Krishna?
> Paul Bunyan = my tax collector?
> Paul Bunyan = the one who made the cat in its own image, and then made the
> humans to gives the vat the modern comfort, with TV nad bag of catnip?
> etc.
>
> Brent
>
>
>  God = the physical universe?
> God = a mathematical structure? Which one?
> God = a dream by a universal machine?
> God = a sum on all dreams by all universal machines?
> God = the one who lost itself in a labyrinth of dreams?
> God = the one who plays hide and seek with Itself?
> God = the universal person?
> God = the universal person completions? (if that exists)
> God = Allah?
> God = Jesus?
> God = Krishna?
> God = my tax collector?
> God = the one who made the cat in its own image, and then made the humans
> to gives the vat the modern comfort, with TV nad bag of catnip?
> etc.
>
>  "Theo" in greek run around the idea of contemplation, examination and
> speculation. A religion is only an as large as possible conception of
> reality, and God is a nickname for what is real,
>
>
> That's disingenuous.  "Reality" is a common word, so we don't need a
> nickname.  You seem to be just making up excuses to use "God".
>
>
> I missed that paragraph.
>
> The problem is that "reality" is easily confused with "physical reality",
> because we are (still) in the aristotelian era. The best general term for
> reality (or source of reality) is
>
>
.... snip ...

 The best general term for reality (or source of reality) is reality (or
source of reality).

Quentin



> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Brent
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to