On 02 Apr 2015, at 08:13, Russell Standish wrote:

On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:07:09AM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:

Which assumes perhaps too strong a form of functionalism and/or digitalism
that runs into its own contradiction with 1p consciousness?

As pointed out in earlier post: With that move, it is no longer relevant to distinguish recording from person who has 1p experience, zombie question is nonsense, no indexical property, there is correct substitution level, all
possible 1p consciousness of all persons supervenes on the recording
(everything digital) *or* none at all since recording has no CC and other such funky consequences I can't recall. How is this avoided if everything
is one bland sauce of digital?

It is not at all obvious that counterfactual correctness (CC) is
required for a computation to be conscious. Bruno usually argues that
feature is a red herring.

I do that in some place, but this is really what Maudlin showed, when keeping materialism and computationalism + the idea that something inactive in a brain during a specific computation would not change the specific consciousness if it were removed. I do that to get the absurdity.

But I keep comp, and counterfactual correctness is a bit of the "essence" of what a computation is. It is what make absurd the idea that a movie could be conscious: it does not enact a computation. It does not need a universal machine to be enactedn unlike any computation. The same movie could correspond to different computations, if we change the universal machine which did that movie, and build an ad hoc different one.



If it is, then non-CC recordings are not
conscious, and the MGA goes through in the small (non-robust) universe
case. But recordings can also be counterfactually correct in principle

by adding the inactive Klara? Then we are again back to Maudlin's point. neurons must know which neurons did not trigger them. They need some telepathy.



(in the form of a huge lookup table, for example, in Searles's Chinese
Room), or in the form of a precise specification of the quantum wave
function, or of a finite chunk of the UD* trace.

You mean description of them, or they actualization or realization by some reality (arithmetical or physical).

You might be slipping from the computation to its description.

Bruno

Modulo the no-cloning
theorem, or the Seth Lloyd limit which would prevent such a recording
existing in our current universe.


Thanks for pushing the question though Russell, as my earlier posts were perhaps less clear on this. I guess you're coming from some ground I can't
parse or have missed reading and you have my apology here if so. But
zombies can be tricky bastards :-)


Where do you draw the line? I'm afraid
intuition does not help much in this matter, which is why I say it is
a weakness of the MGA.


There must be something more to it than just complexity or even Turing universality. Bruno says human-like consciousness requires Lobianity. But
I think that's asking for more than just awarenss; it's asking for
self-awarness.


Which with comp assumptions/environment includes the properties that come with that kind of self-awareness, e.g. incompleteness, machine's silence
etc. PGC


If I were building a Mars Rover and gave it the ability to learn from its experience by reviewing its memory of events and projecting hypothetical futures, I would be concerned that I had created a sentient being that
would forsee its own end.  So I would be sure to avoid putting its
indefinite survival into its value system.

Brent



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to everything- [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au

Latest project: The Amoeba's Secret
        (http://www.hpcoders.com.au/AmoebasSecret.html)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to