On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:26:02AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > This is science. When your theory is contradicted by overwhelming > experimental evidence, it is conventionally taken as evidence that > your theory has been falsified. The MGA puts Bruno's theory in this > category: it has been falsified by the experimental results. >
I don't see that, because AFAICT, the MGA only works for a non-robust ontology. So the only valid conclusion to draw is that COMP + non-robustness has been falsified by the experimental results. Which is what I state in my paper. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
