On 13 May 2015 at 17:14, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote: why should they predominate ? They should only have higher probability > relatively to you.. you're in that class of observers, that certainly > constrains what you can observe... there are many more insects than humans, > yet, you're human... and should not expect to be a mosquito the next > second. We could be absolutely rare, only a geographical incident in the > whole and yet if the whole is... such observers as ourselves observing > consistent physical environment must be.
Well, if I were a mosquito, I wouldn't of course be participating in this conversation. So ideally I would want to be able to justify why the kind of observer capable of this class of interaction might be restricted to 'physical' environments of the sort we observe. I think this may be related to Bruno's idea that our being embedded in an observably 'physical' environment is more than merely geographical - i.e. that we are somehow the beneficiaries of some 'absolute' measure battle for the emergence of observably 'lawlike' phenomena. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
