On 31 July 2016 at 12:25, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK stop right there! Bruno says > "*Nothing can duplicate a first person view from its first person point > of view, with or without computationalism. It just does not make any sense. > It duplicates only the 1-view in the 3-1 view picture*." > > > So although both I and that other fellow (neither of us have any way of > knowing which one of us is the copy and which is the original) have equally > strong memories of writing that diary only one of us has " > *a first person view from its first person point of view* > *", *whatever that means. So that > diary > only belongs to one of us, > > but neither of us knows which one and nobody knows how to find out. > Both copies have a first person view, and both feel that they are the continuation of the original even when they know the duplication has taken place and even if they believe the other copy has similar memories to themselves. Both copies have a diary that is the same up to the point of duplication. -- Stathis Papaioannou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
