On 09 Aug 2016, at 19:24, John Clark wrote:


On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

​> ​I am still waiting for an explanation about your two recent posts which contradicted themselves.

​What are you talking about?​


In a post you agreed with principle 1:

Principle 1: if the guy in Helsinki is assured that the event X will be statified/realized at both W and M, then P(X) = 1.

and you have agreed with principle 2: P_t(X_q) ≠ 1 => P_t'(X_q) ≠ 1, if t' < t, and q > t (P_t = probability evaluated at t, and X_q = some event at time q.

From this I have derived the indeterminacy, and apparently you change your mind on principle 1.







​> ​The first person remains singular for both copies.

​Yes, and BOTH copies are absolutely convinced that they are the Helsinki man and BOTH are correct, I think you agree on that.

Yes.



So it makes sense to ask what one city the Moscow man sees and​ it makes sense to ask what one city the​ Washington man sees but it makes no sense to ask what one city the Helsinki man will see. ​

Why? He knows that he will push a button, and that he will survive one and entire, and this in once of the two city, hetting a doppelganger in the other corresponding cities. If it does not make sense here, it does not make sense in a quantum superposition either.





​> ​One is:​ ​I am in Helsinki. I push on a button. I find myself in a box, I open the door, and I see Moscow. (and for Bruce: and yes, I am conscious of Moscow and of my consciousness (life, experience, first person stories) here in Moscow.​ ​I definitely get the bit "M".

​Bruno continues to use a personal pronoun smokescreen to cover logical contradictions. I have defined "I" as any chunk of matter that behaves in a Johnkclarkian way, and before I pushed the button I already said that I would see Moscow and turn into the Moscow man, and that is exactly precisely what happened. ​ ​So I did not receive one single bit of new information after I pushed the button. ​

​> ​The other is:​ ​I am in Helsinki. I push on a button. I find myself in a box, I open the door, and I see Washington. (and for Bruce: and I am conscious of Washington and of my consciousness (life, experience, first person stories) here in Washington. I definitely get the bit "W".

I have defined "I" as any chunk of matter that behaves in a Johnkclarkian way, and before I pushed the button I already said that I would see Washington and turn into the Washington man, and that is exactly precisely what happened. ​ ​So I did not receive one single bit of new information after I pushed the button. ​

No need for Bruno to post a reply, I already know Bruno's response, I confuse the peepee with the poopoo (or maybe it's the poopoo with the peepee). But I have already given a clear non contradictory definition of the personal pronoun "I", what is Bruno Marchal​'s meaning of that word?​

The 3p-self is the code of the machine. It is simple by ostentation, but technically, it needs the diagonal D'X' = 'X'X'' trick, as explained previously, but that is not needed for the reversal. The 1p self is the owner of the memory (in UDA), and the Theatetetus' knower in AUDA, and I show there that it makes sense thanks to incompleteness. No machine can give a description, but all löbian machine can prove that no machine can give a description of it.

Bruno





 John K Clark






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to