On 23/04/2017 5:05 pm, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
The only direct experience I have is me, not physics.
That is solipsism.
Physics is an explanation of my experiences, not reality.
So your experiences are not real? If physics explains your experiences,
then physics is primary -- it is the reality underlying your experiences.
You said it -- I am not putting words into your mouth. I think you may
be finding that your solipsism leads to nothing but confusion.
Bruce
Quentin
Le 23 avr. 2017 4:08 AM, "John Clark" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Quentin Anciaux
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote:
>
How can you justify logic from physics if logic is primary to
prove anything?
Physics does not need logic or mathematics or anything else to
prove it's existence to us because we all have the ability to
detect physics by direct experience
,
and that far outranks proof.
Humans originally
invented mathematics to better understand and manipulate the
physical world
, and logic is the stuff that produces no inconsistencies with
our observation of that physical world.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
