On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 8:02 pm, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Stathis Papaioannou <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> ​> ​
>>> ​I do expect to survive the
>>> copying process
>>> ​, even better I expect I'll have a backup, although why my expectations
>>> should be of interest to anyone but me I don't know. ​
>>>
>>
>> Then the question “what future experiences will I have” is not
>> nonsensical.
>>
>
> ​It's not ​
> nonsensical
> ​ in our everyday world ​to ask "What one and only one city will I see
> tomorrow?" because it's clear what "I" will mean tomorrow, but people
> duplicating machines don't yet exist in our everyday world because of
> technological, not philosophical, limitations. In our everyday world the I
> of tomorrow has a unique unambiguous meaning, the only being tomorrow that
> will remember being John Clark today.
>
>
>> ​> ​
>> If it were then I could not have the expectation of surviving,
>>
>
> ​The nonsense question is NOT "Will I survive tomorrow after I have been
> duplicated?", that is a real question with a real answer; and it is yes
> because something  (actually 2 things) tomorrow will remember being John
> Clark today. The nonsense question is "What one and only one city will I
> see tomorrow after I have been duplicated?"     ​
>
>

The question is “what city will I see tomorrow”. You know what a city is,
you know what seeing is, you agree that I will survive so “I” has meaning
for you. It seems that you agree the question is meaningful, you just don’t
agree that I will see one city - which means that I will see two cities.
But “I” is singular, and a single person cannot see both cities, as a
matter of empirical fact.

​> ​
>> I could not conceive of having future experiences if “I” loses meaning
>> when I contemplate the post-duplication future.
>>
>
> ​Sure you can, you can conceive of being in Santa Clauses's workshop if
> you want; imagination is not limited by reality.
>

Imagination is limited by logic - I can’t imagine a square circle because
it is meaningless. But I can imagine seeing one or other city with 1/2
probability; it is meaningful, it is what I anticipate will happen, and it
is consistent with the reports of copies  who have been through duplication
multiple times.

> --
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to