On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 6:21:33 PM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 4/16/2018 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2018, at 20:53, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > On 4/13/2018 6:44 AM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > *But since the momentum of either particle doesn't pre-exist the > measurement, there is a FTL influence, which IS hard to understand. In > fact, I doubt anyone does understand it. AG * > > > What would it mean to "understand it" besides being able to use the > equations to make correct inferences? > > > It could mean having a coherent ontology, a coherent phenomenology, and a > coherent explanation of the relations between them. > > > I think "coherent" just means expressed in equations and the > interpretation of them that allows their application. It's not some > separate magic you add. > > Brent. >
If that were the case, why does the physics community makes such a fuss about non-locality? Why all these discussions dating back many decades to Bohr vs Einstein? We have the equations, so we can just calculate and move on. Correct? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
