On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I don't want to get into arguments about pronouns, Then you don't want to talk about Bruno's ideas because personal pronouns are vitally important to it, they are the rug that Bruno uses to cover the gaping holes in Bruno's logic. > > ** > * you've explicitly admitted that you believe there is soul* No. I said information was as close as you can get to the traditional religious concept of the soul and still remain within the scientific method. In the past I pointed out exactly what those similarities and differences were, I will repeat them now: * The soul is non material and so is information. * It's difficult to pin down a unique physical location for the soul, and the same is true for information. *The soul is the essential, must have, part of consciousness, exactly the same situation is true for information. *The soul is immortal and so, potentially, is information. But there are important differences too. *A soul is unique but information can be duplicated. *The soul is and will always remain unfathomable, but information is understandable, in fact, information is the ONLY thing that is understandable. *Information unambiguously exists, I don't think anyone would deny that, but if the soul exists it will never be proven scientifically. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
