On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 7:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What progress? The CI made no sense when it was first proposed 90 years >> ago and it makes no more sense today. >> >
> > I told you; decoherence theory. > What about it, what is your theory of decoherence and how does it make the CI less dumb? *> **I have always regarded Bell results as paradoxical, or if you prefer > unintelligible,* > It's not paradoxical because its not self contradictory and its not unintelligible because the results are clear as a Bell (pun intended), they are just very very odd. > > ** > *in contrast to Bruce who said he had no problem with it.* And that is a wise move on Bruce's part, there is no point in picking a fight with the universe. > > >> Is there supposed to be something controversial about plane waves? >> >> > *> Think about it. They're predicted but don't exist. How could they? LOL. > AG* > Are you confusing plane waves with advanced waves? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
