On Monday, October 22, 2018 at 6:05:41 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 13:55, Philip Thrift <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> It is generally not considered applying Rorty and or Derrida to 
> mathematical language, but mathematics is a language* too, like English. 
> (or programming languages for that matter).
>
>
> Mathematics is no more a language that physics. They use a mathematical 
> language, but the mathematical language is independent of the choice of a 
> theory (written in that mathematical language).
>
> We should always keep in mind the distinction between
> - a mathematical language (usually defined by some grammar which determine 
> the well formed formula)
> - a mathematical theory. (A precise choice of some formula)
> - a model of that mathematical theory (a structure satisfying the axioms 
> of a theory, with truth preserving inference rule).
> - a relation judged plausible between a model of a mathematical theory and 
> a portion or an aspect of some “reality".
>
> Exemple: take arithmetic: 
> - the mathematical language is given by -> f, E, A, “(“, “)”, x, y, z … 
> (logical symbols) with “s”, “0”, “+”, “*” (arithmetical symbols) + the 
> usual formation rule (if X and Y are formula, then X -> Y is a formula, 
> etc.)
> - an arithmetical theory: here the one by Robinson, with only 7 axioms 
> (chosen formula).
>
> 1) 0 ≠ s(x)
> 2) x ≠ y -> s(x) ≠ s(y)
> 3) x ≠ 0 -> Ey(x = s(y)) 
> 4) x+0 = x
> 5) x+s(y) = s(x+y)
> 6) x*0=0
> 7) x*s(y)=(x*y)+x
> + the inference rule of modus ponens
>
> - a model is given by any structure verifying (satisfying) the axioms and 
> truth preserving rule. The standard model is the set N together with the 
> usual addition and multiplication (but there are many models, not all 
> isomorphic to the standard model).
>
>
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
Mathematics, both pure and applied (e.g. physics), is a collection of 
paradigm-specific and domain-specific languages (PSLs, DSLs), just like 
programming languages.

For example ,quantum field theory can be expressed in Hilbert-space or 
path-integral dialects.
http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~kostecki/daniel_ranard_essay.pdf

A "deconstruction" of first-order logic gives theories which replace 
infinite models with finite ones:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2273942

A theory of physics  expressed with a mathematical language inherits the 
metaphysics of the language (e.g. space and time).

- pt


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to